Free quick checks / 3 min
Is your organisation ready for AI?
Is your organisation ready for a first AI project? Data, use case, people, risk and pilot.
01 / The check
Answer honestly, there are no wrong answers
02 / How it works
Three steps to your report
Answer
8 to 10 short questions, about three minutes, in your browser.
Leave your details
Name, work e-mail and company, so we know where to send the report.
Get the report
Your score on screen and the full report by e-mail and as a PDF, with a 30-day plan.
About this check
Ten questions on your data, your use case, your people, your risks and your pilot plan. You get a score, the rules behind it and what to do first.
What happens with your answers and details
Each check takes about three minutes and runs in your browser. Your answers stay there until the last step, where we ask for your name, work e-mail and company, show your result and e-mail you the full report.
How the score works
Your score comes only from your own answers and the rules below. It is not a benchmark against other companies, and we have no data on how others score.
- Every question adds points to one dimension. Single choice earns the listed points (0 to 4). Each ticked option of a multiple-choice question earns 1 point. A scale answer earns its number minus 1.
- A dimension score is the points you earned divided by the points available in that dimension, as a percentage.
- The overall score is all points earned divided by all points available. Every dimension has the same number of questions, so each counts equally.
- Levels follow the overall score: Starting 0 to 29, Developing 30 to 54, Established 55 to 79, Leading 80 to 100.
- Recommendations come from the rules listed per check. The weakest dimensions rank first, and the top three are shown.
Points per question
Each answer shows the points it earns on the dimension of the question.
01 / Data foundation Where does the data for your most promising AI use case live? Up to 4 points
- Scattered over e-mail, spreadsheets and people's heads 0 pts
- In a few business systems that are hard to combine 1 pt
- In a shared database or warehouse we can query 3 pts
- In a governed platform with named data owners 4 pts
02 / Data foundation How good is that data? Up to 4 points
Scale 1 to 5 earns the answer minus 1 (0 to 4 points).
03 / Use case clarity How concrete is the process you want to improve? Up to 4 points
- We have no use case yet 0 pts
- We have general ideas, such as 'use AI for reporting' 1 pt
- We named one process but never measured it 2 pts
- We named one process and measured volume, time and error rate 4 pts
04 / Use case clarity Which of these describe that process? Up to 4 points
- It runs hundreds of times a month or more 1 pt
- The input is text, documents or speech 1 pt
- The steps are mostly the same each time 1 pt
- A person can check the result quickly 1 pt
- None of these 0 pts
05 / Ownership and skills Who would own the result after launch? Up to 4 points
- Nobody has been named 0 pts
- IT would work it out 1 pt
- A business owner is named but has little time 3 pts
- A business owner and a technical owner are named, with time set aside 4 pts
06 / Ownership and skills How much experience does your team have running data or AI solutions in production? Up to 4 points
Scale 1 to 5 earns the answer minus 1 (0 to 4 points).
07 / Risk and rules Could the data for this use case be sent to an external AI service? Up to 4 points
- We do not know 0 pts
- No, and we have no alternative arranged 1 pt
- Yes, but only data without personal information 3 pts
- There is a written rule and approved tooling 4 pts
08 / Risk and rules Which of these are in place for AI use? Up to 4 points
- A list of approved AI tools 1 pt
- Data classified by sensitivity 1 pt
- A named contact for privacy questions 1 pt
- A written rule for using external AI services 1 pt
- None of these 0 pts
09 / Pilot readiness What budget and time exist for a first pilot? Up to 4 points
- None 0 pts
- It is possible, but nothing is planned 1 pt
- A small budget and a likely window 3 pts
- Budget approved and a decision date set 4 pts
10 / Pilot readiness How would you decide that a pilot worked? Up to 4 points
- We have not thought about it 0 pts
- By gut feeling 1 pt
- By one agreed measure, such as hours saved 3 pts
- By an agreed measure and a stop rule if it is not met 4 pts
Recommendation rules
- Data foundation scores below 50 recommend: Make one data source usable first
- Use case clarity scores below 50 recommend: Choose one process and measure it
- Ownership and skills scores below 50 recommend: Name a business owner and a technical owner
- Risk and rules scores below 50 recommend: Write down the rules before the first model
- Pilot readiness scores below 50 recommend: Scope a pilot with one budget and one measure
- You answered 7: "No, and we have no alternative arranged" recommend: Plan for AI that runs where your data may stay
- Overall score is 70 or higher recommend: Add evaluation and shared building blocks before project two
Levels
- Starting (0 to 29): AI projects would run into basics first. That is a normal place to start, and a short scan usually finds the cheapest first step.
- Developing (30 to 54): Some foundations exist. One well-chosen use case with a clear owner is realistic, and a few gaps should be closed first.
- Established (55 to 79): The basics are in place. A pilot on one concrete process is a sound next step, with the remaining gaps handled inside it.
- Leading (80 to 100): You have what a first or second AI project needs. The next question is how to run several safely, with evaluation and shared building blocks.
03 / FAQ
Straight answers about the checks
How is my score calculated?
Every answer earns published points on one dimension. Your dimension scores and the overall score are percentages of the points available. Each check lists every question, every point value and every recommendation rule under 'How the score works'.
Is this a benchmark against other companies?
No. It is a self-assessment against a fixed set of good practices. We do not compare you with other organisations and we have no statistics on how others score.
What happens with my answers?
Your answers stay in your browser until the last step. When you ask for your result, they are sent to us together with your name, work e-mail and company. We recompute your score from them, e-mail you the report and read your answers ourselves, so we can follow up about your result. We keep your details for 12 months. The result link contains your answers only, no personal data.
Why do you ask for my details before the result?
The report is e-mailed to you and a person at NexOps reads your answers, so we need to know who it is for. You only share what is needed: name, work e-mail and company are required, role and phone are optional. The newsletter is a separate box and is off unless you tick it.
What is in the report?
Your score and level, every dimension with what we saw in your answers and why it matters, your top three fixes with steps, a 30-day plan, articles that match your weak spots and the engagement we would start with. It comes as an e-mail and as a PDF. There are no prices in it.
Can I have my details deleted?
Yes, at any time. Reply to the report e-mail or write to info@nexops.nl and we delete your details and your answers.
What does a low score mean?
That the practice is not in place yet, not that your organisation is doing badly. Many good teams start low and move quickly once the first gap is closed. The recommendations show where to start.
Next step
Tell us what you want to build
Bring one process, one platform or one idea. We reply within two working days and say plainly whether we are the right team for it.
Currently accepting projects for Q4 2026